The prodigiously
talented Helen Oyeyemi follows up her ingeniously haunting debut,
‘The Icarus girl’ with a novel that ostensibly seeks
to further explore the themes of race and identity, which were touched
on in her first book.
The first thing I noticed about the Opposite House
is how much the actual content of the book differs from the in depth
explanation on the sleeve notes. We are told that it is about the
young and newly pregnant Maja’s quest to reconcile herself
to her African/Cuban heritage whilst living in the UK when she has
very little memory of the country she left behind. At the same time,
Oyeyemi continues to indulge her fascination with the spirit world
in the guise of the goddess Yemaya Saramagua who apparently is bewildered
by her fellow gods defecting to the physical world posing as ‘saints’.
I can only suspect that what is described here is to give the reader
an overview of what Ms Oyeyemi intended to convey but that might
not be so clear initially. By the end of the novel I could not help
thinking how much of the sleeve notes did not reflect the end product
and in a way I wish they had as it would have probably made for
a better, more defined read.
Ms Oyeyemi has an uncanny, almost seductive way
of engaging the reader- even if one is not all that convinced by
what she’s trying to say. It is a sheer delight to see how
malleable and flexible language becomes in the young writers hands.
An unabashed die-hard fan of Emily Dickinson (the title of the novel
taken from a line in the poem ‘There’s been a death
in the opposite house’) Oyeyemi’s writing style, particularly
in this second book embraces a more poetic form that in many ways
is a saving grace. I might not have always been able to understand
what she was trying to say but boy, was it delicious to read. Another
aspect in which Ms Oyeyemi excels is in her fearlessness in dealing
with the idea of mental instability, presenting it in an everyday
– almost mundane way. The effect of this is not bathos or
to trivialise those dealing with such issues – instead quite
the opposite she makes the reader aware of how easy it could be
to cross the sanity line, how things that should raise alarm can
become quite routine and ordinary to the sufferer. Oyeyemi somehow
manages to bring the reader along this precarious journey from sanity
to insanity with a great sense of empathy. What’s more she
has seemed determined in her first two books to draw attention to
the relationship between psychological problems and dalliance with
aspects of the supernatural. Almost as to serve as a cautionary
tale that mere mortals cannot have too much exposure to the spirit
world without adverse consequences.
The issue of emotional and mental fragility is
dealt superbly through Maja’s constant reference to her ‘hysteric’;
a sort of alter ego that embodies all her deep-seated neurosis and
can lead Maja down any path from paranoia to attempting suicide.
This is somehow tied up with her loving but volatile relationship
with her mother, the idiosyncratic Chabella. This is another theme
continued from her first book, the idea of an imposing, almost untouchable
matriarchal figure one that is at once, admired, loved, feared and
loathed by her daughter. When trying to describe her ‘hysteric’
Maja opines
‘She is not part of me, she is part of my
store. In times of need she converts into my emergency image of
Chabella, a poorly done portrait that I can show people when I need
to ask ‘Have you seen this woman?’ ’
Maja eschews her mother’s hybrid animistic/Roman
Catholic faith as she offers paper sacrifices to her gods, looking
upon Chabella’s efforts as misguided attempts to hold onto
an idea of Cuba that may or may not have existed.
Oyeyemi also handles the relationship between Maja
and her Ewe-Speaking Ghana-born and raised English boyfriend, Aaron
with class and delicacy – simply beautiful. I was particularly
happy Ms Oyeyemi chose to make Aaron an honorary member of the Ewe
ethnic group of Ghana since my maternal grandfather hails from that
part of the country.
With a healthy dose of sympathy, she helps the reader gets a good
understanding of the challenges facing the young couple, baby on
the way, Aaron’s demanding job as a doctor and the resulting
strain on the relationship it sometimes causes, his attempts to
understand Maja in all her complexity and the patience in which
he does as well as a clever spin on the issue of being in a mixed
race relationship. Aaron the white man growing up in a ‘black’
country and well conversant with the culture and language and Maja,
born to parents of African descent in a country perceived by many
as ‘white’ but unable to fully come to grips with an
African culture her European boyfriend can nearly take for granted.
However I came unstuck when trying to understand
what Ms Oyeyemi was trying to say in the novel. Maybe she was not
trying to say anything at all but throughout the book there is a
sense she wants to make a point – or several points- that
in my mind were not truly developed. There are a few non-committal
attempts to tackle definitions of nationality and patriotism but
Oyeyemi seems to cancel her points out. Her irascible best friend
Amy Eleni insists on being called by her full name in honour of
her Cypriot roots but then berates a Nigerian school colleague for
claiming to love the country even though she doesn’t live
there… ‘People need to stop using love of some country
that they don’t live in as an excuse for their inability to
shut up about it…’ she scrawls on Maja’s hand
during an assembly. I found this to be one of the most obtuse statements
made in the book – since when did full time residency become
the main factor with which to gauge ones regard for their country
of origin? Tell that to thousands who flee war-ravaged countries
they love when the only other alternative is almost certain rape
and death at the hands of a member of one faction or another.
The amorphous nature of the message Oyeyemi seeks
to champion would not be a problem if it were just a great character-driven
novel where any point made was a by-product of the enjoyment gained
from the colourful, fully developed characters a la Zadie Smith.
There is an element of the Zeitgeisty writing-style in ‘The
Opposite House’ that propelled books such as ‘White
Teeth’ to fame. Where Oyeyemi falls down is that some of the
characters are somewhat frayed at the edges, not thought out properly,
lacking ‘motivation’ as the famous acting turn of phrase
goes. For instance Amy Eleni seems unnecessarily bitter and difficult
to like. Apart from references to a suspiciously thin mother and
a vague sense of regret that her attraction to the same sex precludes
her from having children of her own, there seems to be no real reason
for this. Amy Eleni’s relationship with Maja seems to be based
on one girl of impressionable character giving deference to a stronger,
more intimidating personality. One can only assume they are friends
because of Amy Eleni’s refusal to go away which I suppose
can be interpreted as loyalty – or perhaps not having any
other friends because she’s a bridge-burning cocky piece of
work.
There’s also the loveable but elusive ‘London-Baby’
Tomas, Maja’s younger brother. I can’t work out if he’s
enigmatic because Oyeyemi purposed him to be or that his character
is not fully formed. There are a few references made to Tomas not
being able to get used to his birth-name and responding to absolutely
any name called out- even by total strangers. Towards the end of
the book Maja reflects
‘If you put a name to this boy he’ll
die. Chabella and Papi mustn’t do it any more- it bothers
him’.
Once again it is unclear what the relevance of
this is or what the author wants to get across here. I can only
guess Ms Oyeyemi is comparing Tomas difficulty in getting accustomed
to a permanent name to the transient nature of identity, culture
and how they are defined – but I fear I am clutching at straws
here.
I won’t even go into why I could not make
head or tail of the significance of the goddess Yemaya and the ‘somewherehouse’,
straddling Lagos and London, which she inhabits. What promised to
be resolved and tied in with the rest of the story at the end of
the book could just as well have existed independently of the novel.
Better still, it did not appear to serve any real purpose in the
book, breaking up the most enjoyable parts of the story, and should
have been left out altogether.
Nevertheless Oyeyemi is undoubtedly a serious talent.
As soon as I noticed one or more of the deficiencies in this follow
up to her flawless debut I was distracted once again by how enjoyable
it is just to read what she writes – point made or no point
made. It’s just that ‘The Opposite House’ would
have been a more complete novel without these shortcomings. But
anyone who can beautify language the way Ms Oyeyemi does could and
should have any multitude of literary sins overlooked.
|