Up until
he died on 17th April, the man for his own part was very
much alive, remaining a factor in his country’s politics well into
the tenth and final decade of his life. Aime Cesaire wrote the inspirational
poem and coined the rallying cry under which many an African nationalist
marched to independence. This man, who counted Frantz Fanon among
his students at the Lycee Schoelcher, served in the trenches of
that warfare in his speeches and his campaigns. He was poet and
politician, playwright and essayist, marrying fellow negritudist,
Suzanne Roussi in the same month that he published his most famous
work (Notebook of a Return to my Native Land) in 1939.
One hallmark of his life was the longevity of the
philosopher-poet in political corridors. Nearly fifty years after
his first success in 1945, he continued to win mayoral elections
in Fort-de-France, a record that should provoke some envy from many,
not least of all, the embattled Robert Mugabe. In spite of his location,
Aime Cesaire was not disconnected from the African reality. In 1967,
his play, Une Saison au Congo on the death of Patrice Lumumba
was performed in Paris, and during his editorial stint at the literary
review, Tropiques, the negritude themes of African culture
retained prominence.
Yet it was also true that when it was time to make
the bid, he kept his eyes firmly on his own reality. In 1946, he
supported the compromise of assimilation rather than independence
that made Martinique an overseas department of France. In 1958,
this contemporary of Charles De Gaulle supported the Communaute
Francaise which bought the island more autonomy under the sway
of France.
Aime & the African Angst.
Eventually though, we have to ask: does Africanness matter,
ultimately? So what, if people fail to follow up their notes
for a return, whether figuratively or otherwise? Set beside
the exigency of putting three daily meals on the family diner, of
playing the best game of one’s cards, whether one lives on the continent
or in some far-flung Diaspora, does it matter what skin one wears
or the geographical affiliation or cultural heritage of one’s forbears?
James Currey, in his interview in
this issue with Moroccan student, Nourdin Bejjit, quotes Denis Brutus
‘Look, it’s all very well, you know, but I
want to be regarded as a poet, not just as an African.’
Many artists and writers dread the ‘ghettoization’
implicit in a career that is constricted to African-only media -
even media as hallowed as the African Writers Series (may it
rest in peace). Perhaps because of this, they will not exhibit
in an ‘African’ Gallery, or publish in an ‘African’ series, or journal,
which is destined for the ethnic corner of the bookshops that will
deign to stock them. It is perhaps in the same spirit that some
women will refuse the patronage of women-only anthologies or prizes
(unless they are too rich to spurn): they do not want the patronage
of quota-aided success. They want to triumph on a level playing-field.
Even the slogans are dated… Black and Proud… Black Power…Wole
Soyinka famously derided Negritude in the terms that a tiger hardly
needs to proclaim its tigritude.
When the decision to spurn the ‘African’ label
is made early in a career, there may be the small conceit of a confidence
in a talent that is substantial enough to tower, not just in an
African planter box but in the jungle of the world; but there is
also the long-view of the brand-making, pigeon-holing process at
work in the minds of the critical and ordinary audience - because
artists and writers are brands like other commodities in the marketplace.
- And a brand that starts out ethnic may find it difficult to break
into a more universal marketplace.
Yet, all this assumes that the playing field is
level. For individuals, whether professionals, artists and writers
of course, the field may be more than level. Africans have won the
most coveted prizes from the Nobels to the Olympics. Within the
nuclear confines of individual opportunity and peculiar talent,
neither skin nor geography will matter. Yet as a people, we are
still very much on the outside, looking in.
In all fields of endeavour, the language of engagement
has changed. It is no longer about the protest of conquest. It is
now about the conquest of protest. There is a sense that Africans
who continue to agitate for reform, for ‘freedom’, over reparations,
against globalisation, and sundry issues are trouble makers, permanent
radicals who will always find an excuse for their own failures.
For an African student on the last year of her PhD, or the early
years of a high-flying career it may seem professional suicide to
be tarred with the brush of protest in the eyes of the Western gatekeepers
of professional success. Yet, that is the viable age of protest.
A 28-year-old Achebe published Things Fall Apart, the iconic book
at the centre of an /University
of Nottingham 50th Anniversary conference
in September. A 26-year-old Cesaire published Cahier d‘un Retour
au Pays Natal. The African revolutionaries of the independence
era were mostly in their twenties and thirties. And it remains true
that the ogres that one settles for in one's youth will be his pallbearers.
Unfortunately, the climate of protest appears to be dead. Perhaps
there truly is nothing more to protest; perhaps all that remains
is for Africans to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, overthrow
their own thieves and dictators and fix the shoulder to the good
old wheel... or perhaps the mortgage weighs too heavily on the conscience
of the 21st century African.
In the past, Africans who achieved a degree of
penetration into elite society still saw their unalterable destiny
with the masses left behind. The psychiatrist, Frantz Fanon, the
prize student Aime Cesaire, the Mandelas, the Azikiwes… these were
all legitimate aspirants to the ample berths of comfort available
to the elite of the age.
Yet, perhaps the perils they confronted - the wholesale
ownership of countries by countries - had too close an affinity
to the wholesale ownership of people by people. Colonialism, like
slavery, manifestly, had to die. In a sense, the immoralities at
the heart of 21st century problems lack that black-and-white
clarity. The culprits of the present age are no longer the stock
villains. Indeed, their ranks are mostly black, peopled by a raft
of dictators and light-fingered administrators who hail from the
same hovels as the hordes they oppress. The frontlines of the trench
warfare are no longer easy to delineate, the Enemy is no longer
far away and easy to villify. Nigerian poet, Olajumoke Verissimo,
in her protest piece, Retrospection,
which is published in this issue, rails against the IMF, the World
Bank and sundry faces of imperialism, concluding,
I am the welt of the world,
the caustic memories of black labour,
whose inheritance is of slummed fathers.
Yet, we also live in an age when a black man whose
father was Kenyan is a front-runner for the American presidency.
Future negotiations between Africa and her great millstone may well
be with her own spawn. The IMF delegation ladling out austere conditionalities
to comatose African countries may well be headed by an African director.
The waters of the race issue are certainly muddied. But it remains
true that unless Africans, Diasporans or otherwise, understand and
develop a consciousness within the reality of the African Condition,
they will become part of the problem. There was after all, a phase
in Olaudah Equiano’s inspirational life when he found himself in
the boots of a slavedriver. One of the most striking areas where
this consciousness is lacking is in the area of the international
arms trade, that long time partner of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.
Most African countries, like many Caribbean isles,
are too small for bootstrap action, anyway. In the absence of strong
federations, the notion of true independence was ever always fragile.
The reality of dependency was the reality to be courted and settled
for. Dependency was the everyday girl in the poem that follows,
which could well be a universal Diasporan anthem to the country
of residence:
I’ll love you, everyday girl -
not as much as my amour, but she is far away,
and you are here to stay.
I’ll love you everyday girl
and I’ll fill your arms with babies, so help me God
The power of the rich and powerful to pauperise
the relatively innocent cannot be underestimated. The beautiful
vignettes in the collection of Caribbean stories titled, Cuba
on the Edge, browsed in this issue, paint the picture of
a country and hapless generation stunted and impoverished by an
ancient quarrel with the neighbour to the north. When the character,
Alborada, dies dreaming of a cup of real coffee (The Happy Death
of Alborada Almanza, by Leonardo Padura Fuentes), or
the character, Lisanka, improvises sanitary towels from a carefully
cut up bed sheet (Women of the Federation by Francisco Garcia
Gonzalez), all this 90 miles from the sump of consumer excess that
is the United States, we get a sense of a stillborn revolution.
Across Africa, across her Diaspora, across the
world that knows the African Condition, the idea of actually reprieving
suffering and dying populations is still very much a revolutionary
one - that articulation of the problem and execution of its solution.
Not too long ago, the Nobel Laureate, 80-year-old Jim Watson emerged
from his Cold Spring Harbour laboratory to suggest that Africa’s
problem was due to the fact that they were dumber than most. He
was shouted out of the halls of Political Correctness and such conversations
are back in the private lounges were they were before. Yet, the
statistics that provide the oxygen for his racist commentaries are
in the public domain. The lists of the 50 poorest countries of the
world, tallied beside the list of African nations. The disproportionate
representation of Diasporan Africans, relative to their proportion
in the general population, in the jails, asylums and slums of their
respective countries, from the United States, through Europe, to
the rest of the world.
It cannot be heresy to stipulate that children
reared in malarial swamps on a meal a day, who attend their first
school in their teens will grow up stunted physically and mentally
and will not compete with Western children from whose nursery classroom
the last XP computers have been ripped out in favour of Vista-designed
models.
Veronique Tadjo’s Blind
Kingdom, whose first two chapters are reprinted here in
translation, is an allegory on the African Elite. In her interview
with her translator, Janis A. Mayes, she says
For me the problem with our continent resides
principally in its blind elite. The bourgeoisie could have been
a factor for progress but in fact they were rapacious and blind
and have failed the majority of the people.
The prime problems are not local, however, have never been local.
If proof is required, we need not look beyond the last shipment from
the three cornered Trans-Altantic Slave Trade — the vessel that
butted vainly around southern African ports in the fortunate floodlight
of world media, seeking a port through which to discharge arms to
the landlocked Zimbabwe, evoking unfortunate parallels between the
beleaguered Comrade, who no longer rules by popular acclaim, with
any other slave-shipping potentate of historic Africa who harvests
his victim with the sickle of foreign arms. It was not the imbecility
of the Congolese that left Sese Seko in power over the decades of
his misrule. There was an arms factor in the mix.
Aime Cesaire died an ex-mayor on one of the smaller
Caribbean Islands. His Negritude philosophy, his independence streak,
was mediated by his country’s proximity to and dependency on France.
Most of the residents of the second largest continent in the world
suffer worse small-island syndromes. The ranks of the Pan-Africanists
are thin. Those ruler lines drawn across sand and thicket, across
clan and jungle by colonists in the European conferences of partition
have acquired the impermeableness of concrete walls.
Too much has been made of the end of the Slave
Trade. That trade was always associated with a parallel Trade in
Arms. The Trans Atlantic Slave trade would never have reached the
dimensions it did, had the ships that ferried slaves to the new
world not returned to Africa with the arms that established the
potentates of that era. The images of the army in Myanmar crushing
unarmed, red-clad monks into the ground is still fresh in memory.
It is a mockery to talk about spreading democracy while spreading
arms. One of the most important courtroom battles today takes place
in a British courtroom. On 10th April 2008, a London
high court ruled that the British Government acted illegally in
stopping the Serious Frauds Office from investigating allegations
that BAE had bribed the Saudis in the course of an arms deal. The
story of BAE, one of the largest British companies, paying billions
of pounds in bribes from Saudi Arabia to Tanzania to corruptly foist
the sale of arms on countries most of whom are desperately in need
of bread and books, is a story too scandalous for fiction. It is
immoral for African states to spend, or be forced to spend, millions
of dollars on arms in the context of their problems. From Cape to
Cairo, the harvest of the arms sold by BAE and its coterie of arms
dealers continue to be gathered: in wars and conflicts, in ungovernable
nations, in refugees in their millions, and in children who are
more versed in arms than farms.
The British charities, CAAT (Campaign against Arms
Trade) and Corner House deserved plaudits for bringing the lawsuit,
and for their continuing work in pressing the British government
on their opposition to a blanket ban on cluster bombs.
If Aime died of complications attending old age,
what killed Negritude then? Embarassment, more likely. On the one
part were the enduring jibes, on the other, the hash made of their
token independence by that generation. As we lay the ghost of Negritude
willy-nilly, what are those bracing philosophies, those mind-affirming
paradigms that stand in the wings? For bondage is first of all mental.
Clearly, people of Aime Cesaire’s early stamp are
still needed to make sense of an even more complicated world. Men
like Afam Akeh, co-founder of
and editor of her first three editions, whose essays were aware,
and who has now moved on to other challenges, men who will leave
the African Condition rather better off than they met it. The singular
role of leadership is to make sense of a clear historic duty, and
to sound a clear clarion call for action. Wole Soyinka was right
about one thing: it is pretty unlikely that tigers would go on and
on about their tigritude. They lack the articulation to start with,
and even as they go extinct from the jungles of Sumatera we will
not so much as get a plaintive roar from them. On the continent
of Africa, people - men, women and children, die unaccountably and
unacceptably. Across the Diaspora a more subtle but no less pernicious
carnage is replicated in the wastelands of inner cities and the
fatherlands of jailhouses and asylums. It behoves those who have
voice to use it. It we have no more ‘rebels’, it is not for want
of causes. It remains for African thinkers, and for their friends
and partners around the world, to fashion the paradigms that will
articulate the angst of the 21st century continent and
Diaspora. Negritude may have seen its day, but Africa still awaits
her redemption.
Chuma Nwokolo, Jr.
Publisher - and Editor of Issue 4. |
|
|
|
|
|