|
Day 1; Publishing and Yesterday’s Business
August 4, 2008; I woke up at 5.00am and rushed into the bathroom
to get ready for the day. The trip from Queens, New York, to Danbury,
Connecticut, was a 90-minute drive. Our first workshop on The Publishing
Process would start at 9.00am. My calculation was to leave at 6.00am
and get to Danbury latest 8.Am. I wanted to give myself an hour
for contingencies.
While going through my writing notebooks, searching for what to
recycle, I came across a quote that answered a question that had
stumped me for a long time. In these residencies, when I submitted
stories for peer review, one of the recurring questions I faced
was why my stories were always dark and unhappy. Because most of
my stories were set in Africa, I often get asked if good things
never happened there. I had battled with an appropriate answer.
While I did not want to help perpetuate stereotypes, I’d want
to be true to myself. So this quote from Aminata Sow Fall gave me
a great answer:
An African writer cannot and
must not take pen in hand merely to offer pretty expressions and
phrases. As the product of a society that has its problems, he
can and must help in their presentation so that each person becomes
completely aware of them, so that people think of them and look
for their solution. If that is what it means to be a committed
writer, then that is what I am.
On the same page where I found the
quote above, I also found this by the godfather of African literature,
Chinua Achebe. He was talking about stereotypes and here is what
he said:
Stereotypes are not necessarily
malicious. They may be well meaning and even friendly. But in
every case, they show a carelessness or laziness or indifference
of attitude that implies that the object of your categorization
is not worth the trouble of individual assessment
I said yeah to the quote.
Soon I was ready to head out as scheduled. The roads were pretty
clear. I got to Danbury at 7.23 am. I stopped at Stop & Shop to
buy few items I would need in my hall of residence, items I forgot
to pick up from home.
The Publishing Process Workshop was what it ought to be. There were
two manuscripts of short stories that were given to us for peer
review and possible recommendation for publication. We stimulated
the University Press publishing process. In my contribution, I found
the first manuscript wanting and I gave the second one a glowing
recommendation. Even though the first manuscript was not up to par
in my eyes, there were some lines in it that I found interesting.
One was when the narrator said that for Catholics, “worse
than having premarital sex was using birth control.” I did
not know that.
The other line was when the child narrator gave her perspective
of Mary, the mother of Jesus in this way: “Not to mention
that it did God the world of good to have Mary in the picture, just
from a PR point of view.”
On the second manuscript, I simply said that I was sure it was on
its way to a bookstore near you. It was that good and a joy to read.
A twist in one particular story was a delight. It made me wonder
why I didn’t come up with stuff like that. When that happened,
I knew I was reading great stuff.
Other participants seemed to agree with my assessment.
7.00 PM Eastern: Ok. I've got few minutes so I will round up the
day so far. There is a literary event up at a beautiful mansion
up in the hills. Reading will be one of my mentors who encouraged
me last semester to bring out the 'story' in my short story.
First of all, let me get a conflict out of the way: I was scared
of coming here today. In an online class last semester, I wrote
an unsympathetic critique of a colleague’s work that caused
an uproar. I did not mean to do that and I had to apologize.
Because I could not place the face of this colleague, I was worried
that it might be one of my friends. (I should probably mention that
I am no good at names or faces.) Anyway, he happened to be in the
Publishing Workshop and when he eventually introduced himself to
the class, I was taken aback. He could have crushed me if we had
opted to settle things physically.
Anyway, at first I did not know how to approach him. For the first
four hours we did not greet each other; we had opportunities to
approach one another and shake hands but we didn’t.
Well, just before dinner I was man enough to go up to him. He said
he had forgiven me and forgotten the incident. We smiled. Reading
his response to my critique I did not know that he could smile.
He had been so bombastic and defiant in his rebuttal.
Other important things that happened: I met one of my mentors for
the semester. He was an accomplished writer who was very enthusiastic
about the ideas I had for the semester. He had published many books
and had written the screenplay for a movie. He knew the people that
mattered in the New York publishing industry. He told me it was
no longer enough to write a good story or even a great one. He said
my work must be stunning to have a chance. He wanted me to give
him a stunning work and he would give me the best agent in New York.
I felt like the ball was now in my court.
He reinforced in me the feeling that I must give voice to the stories
of people who were incapable of telling their stories.
Earlier, I checked into my dorm room. Now, that was a story on its
own. It was first time in about 15 years that I had entered a college
dorm. When I was told I would have three roommates I thought I would
be sharing bunk beds. I had three roommates alright, but we each
had our bedrooms. –
And the beds were twin-size, with queen-size beddings. This night
would be interesting.
Day Two: Screenplays and Smoke
Screens
I am paying thousands of dollars to learn how to write professionally.
But I will give you the core knowledge here – for free.
Yes. I have a mentor who knows everything. When he opens his mouth,
the wisdom acquired over the years gush out. At one point today,
I asked him why he had not written a book on writing. He had written
many successful books, but none on how to write. He did not answer
me. I guess he has no interest in such a book. I have read many
of such books; none gave me cause to take notes the way I did, listening
to him.
I started this morning in his workshop on screenplay. I pitched
my idea of a screenplay and the class helped me refine it. It turned
out that the screenplay I wrote and called A Diary of a Wasted
Poet was three screenplays in one. No wonder I could never explain
it in one sentence.
I later met with him in-between lunch and a screenplay discussion
with Hollywood writers and Television executives. I pitched a story
to a Television executive which he found interesting. He told me
the idea could easily be stolen so I ain’t gonna mention it
here! He asked me to work on it.
A prominent newspaper columnist also spoke in the afternoon. He
said the newspaper industry was dying and he had no advice for those
trying to get in. I said they should try blogging.
So I will present below some wonderful things I learnt from my mentor.
- Without conflict there is no motor to turn the
story.
- In a story, the main character has to change and
the change has to be external.
- When you are a writer, people will always come to
you and tell you to write about them because they have interesting
stories to tell. We know their stories are not interesting and
cannot be written without significant modifications that will
make them mad at the end.
- All plots that are not emanating from character
are melodramas.
- Until you can state in one declared sentence what
your screenplay is, you are not ready to start.
- The idea to write what you know is trash.
- You must know the controlling idea of your story.
- In all you tell, go for the heart. Reach the reader’s
heart.
- Writing itself is an act of discovery.
- We have to be an incredible rejecter of our own
ideas.
- As writers, we have taken our vow of poverty.
- Always, always go deeper.
A grandma was reading a story to her grandson in a
Laundromat. Each time she stopped and looked up to check on her
laundry spinning in the washer, the grand son would say to her,
“And what happened?”
You have to make your readers always say, “And what happened?”
Well, it is about 2AM. I have been up reading stories for workshops
coming up tomorrow and next tomorrow and next next tomorrow… My head is full of characters. Maybe tomorrow, I will
have the time to tell you about some of the characters here. Yes.
When writers gather, the world is missing many of its weird souls.
Until tomorrow, “Hope and hope removed makes it a sick heart.”
Day Three: Attack of the Pretty Girls
Just as I caught my breath after presenting my screenplay
pitch, she passed to me a hand-written note. Her gesture catapulted
me back to my days as a fifteen-year-old freshman in college.
It was my first week and I had gone to the cafeteria to eat. Akure
was a strange land for me and I was still standing on one foot like
a fowl in an alien field.
I got my plate of rice and stew and scanned for an unoccupied table
where I would eat alone, for I only knew one student in the whole
college. As I made my way to a table in the corner, this pretty
girl walked up to me. I sneaked a quick glance at her; she was the
one that won the Miss Campus competition the weekend I arrived.
I had no experience talking to girls. I was a timid boys’
high school product. A nerd, you might say. But if I were to suddenly
develop the courage to talk to girls, it would never in this world
be a girl like this. She was out of my league. She was not just
beautiful, she knew it.
I froze on the spot as she approached. I was sure the heavens would
fall on the cafeteria roof and together they would all land on my
head.
“Can I taste your food?” she asked, a few inches away
from me.
In my head rang a violent, “What? Taste my food?”
I could not look at her face. I just handed her my plate of rice.
I would buy another one, I told myself.
She took my plate of food and held it in her hands for a few seconds.
Then she said, “Thank you,” and placed it back in my
hands, which were still stretched out towards her.
As she walked away to join the queue for food, I heard boys whistling.
*
I glanced at the note this pretty girl passed to me
this morning. At the top she had written Rudolf with a ‘ph’.
I stopped myself from reading further. I tried to listen to the
science fiction pitch the other student was presenting. But half
of my mind was on that note. What could it be about?
Last semester, there were two pretty girls in the program, just
two. I knew because I got to eat sushi with them at a Japanese Restaurant
(That is a story for another day). This semester, there were two
more. And these two were different. They were everywhere. And they
were flaunting it. Skimpy shorts, tank top, high heels, I mean,
it was impossible to avoid them.
The one that passed me a note also talked a lot. She expressed herself
quite unlike most fresh year students.
Last semester, I wondered what pretty girls were doing in a writing
class. Then I read Nadia Smith, Jhumpa Lahiri, Kiran Desai, and
Chimamanda Adichie. I looked at their pictures on the back cover
and I understood.
Residencies like this are just an aggregate of weird people. Some
talk to themselves. With some you will never hear their voices…
but when you read their works you’ll panic. Some seem to me
to be retired serial killers. Some wear a pair of jeans and T-shirt
for a week. Some carry a backpack with all they owned. It is all
full of eccentrics.
…and then the pretty girls.
These girls seem out of place. In fact, what makes them more foreign
is any attempt to flaunt their endowments. Flaunt for whom? Men
who had not combed their hair in weeks? Or the ones who wear sleeveless
shirts, exposing armpits that had not been shaved in years? There
were very few who looked like they had gone out on a date in years.
Why then, pretty girls? Why?
In fact, reading the stories that these men pass around, you could
see that when they wanted a pretty girl, they went to their writing
table and created one.
Anyway, most of the writers in this residency lived like normal
people outside. Some are waiters, some work in casinos, some write
for small newspapers, some work in construction, some teach in schools,
some work for non-profit organizations, some just left the military
(those ones often write about killing everyone to save the world),
some are hostesses and some are dancers.
The motivation to write varies a lot. Some have seen things. Some
have people who have no voice they want to speak for. Some hear
voices.
The pretty girl in this story wants revenge. And that is a legitimate
reason to write.
Fifteen or so years ago, as I sat down to finally eat the food I
had handed to Miss Campus, I thought about what she asked me, “Can
I taste your food?” It occurred to me that she meant was,
“Can I feel your food?” She wanted to know if it was
hot enough for her, before she placed her order.
As I sat down in a panel discussion that followed, I finally read
her note. It did not say “Meet me in Room 419.” It simply
outlined the ideas for my screenplay that workshop participants
had suggested.
By the time movie and literary agents come, I will really tell you
why they pay special attention to pretty girls who have launched
a fierce attack on the literary landscape.
For now, my guess is that if you want to write in this TV age, you
should either have the talent or the TV face. If you have the two,
you are on your way to the Oprah Winfrey Show.
OK. I got to run. It is time to get ready for Day Four.
Day Four: Elements of Fiction
Graduates of the University of Iowa Writing Program are
arguably the best there are. But when they teach at other writing
programs, they try not to brag about Iowa. But they never fail to
mention it. They often give instances of workshops in Iowa where
professors made writers throw up when their stories were critiqued.
Well, we have had a few of the Iowa products here. They did not
make anyone cry. But they did impart their wisdom.
Prior to this workshop, we participants were asked to turn in stories
for consideration. Out of about twelve stories turned in, only two
were selected. We read the two stories and came in prepared with
our observations. The names of the writers were not on the stories.
One of the stories was about a killer from a mob family. It was
horrifying. The main character’s way of killing with the knife
was shocking.
Sitting on my right in the workshop was this student whose voice
I had never heard . He never spoke in my presence. For some reason,
it was the first time I was in the same workshop with him. At the
beginning of the workshop, the professor identified the writers
of the stories. It happened that the student on my right was the
author of the mob story. I whispered to the student on my left,
“Do you think I am safe sitting beside him?”
Here are elements of fiction that I gathered in a short story workshop
- There are limited pools of mistakes people make
in writing. You can find them, avoid them and have your writing
improve.
- Try to avoid topic sentences. It does the work of
the reader.
- Be mindful of adverbs. They add flop to
a sentence. An adverb is a sign of a lazy verb. Use adverbs as
the last resort.
- ‘Walk’ is a painful word. You can overuse
it.
- One word you can use all the time is ‘said’.
It is an invisible tag. Don’t work too hard to come up with
dialogue tag other than ‘said’.
- Never name a character unless he is important to
the story. If you give a character a name people will want to
know more about the character.
- In magical realism, the first line has to show the
premise of the story.
- If a story is working, you will not notice the point
of view.
- If you cannot do the hard work involved
in writing, go and do something else that is easier.
- Avoid point of view violations.
- Mind the word ‘was’. There is a ‘was’
disease in fiction. You can easily replace the passive voice.
- Words like “lugubrious’ are not reader-friendly.
- Anything can happen at the end of a story.
But the ending should be surprising but inevitable. So avoid ‘either
or’ ending. If you face the ‘either or’ situation,
throw in the curve ball.
- Dictum about the gun - don’t put it on the
wall if you are not going to use it.
- Start your story where it happened – close
to the conflict.
“Success in writing is not rare,” so said
the professor. “You can be an instant success. It doesn’t
happen everyday. But it happens often enough.”
He should know – his novel made it big.
Now that I have gotten the fiction out of the way, I will talk about
non-fiction next.
Day Five: Writing is Hard
In high school, the often-heard expression as we prepared for our
General Certificate of Education examination was that English as
a subject did not need any studying. These were people whose primary
language of communication was Igbo. In two sessions of non-fiction
workshops, I walked out feeling like someone who had approached
non-fiction writing with that kind of attitude.
While I was sleeping, nonfiction grew wings and flew away. And there
I was still stretching my hands in search of it, while it was kiting
high in the sky.
Creative non-fiction is the term used for non-fiction writing that
made the cut. It requires the use of fictional techniques like character-development,
plot, suspense, dialogue, sensory description, personal reflection
and self-exploration. If you are writing literary journalism, it
will require the narrative arc. If you are writing memoir, it will
require a character arc. And if you are writing essay, it will require
a thematic arc.
The reader wants the writer to bring the story to life. After all,
all literature is longing- someone will always want something they
cannot have. The events that conspire to get in the way of what
they want make the plot.
It is critical to identify where the reader enters your story. That
is why it is important to identify the conflict and set it up first.
Readers often enter the story at the point where the character is
most vulnerable.
Also important to the story is the structure – which means
the way you arrange the story for the reader –flashbacks,
flash-forwards, scenes, and other literary techniques.
In writing a memoir, it is important to handle well the double perspective
– this stands for what you thought at the time and what you
know now.
Metaphors should be used if they serve the story and not the reverse.
Too many metaphors are a smoke screen. Metaphors should work on
a sensory as well as emotional level.
Writers must be able to identify the scenes that should be well-defined.
And for the rest, writers should do what Hemingway called “murder
your darling.”
Avoid tension that seems artificial.
Whatever you do, remember that the reader must care about your character
to invest in him or her. As for the writer, he or she must believe
in the story to be able to deliver it.
“In a really great story, the words disappear.”
Writing is hard. It took me six days of intensive workshops and
lectures to come to that, often forgotten, conclusion. Those who
are lucky to have found a way to write things others can feel, in
the writing world, are blessed.
Of course, the first step in all these is to keep writing. After
so much debate, internal and external, often intense and retrogressive,
I agreed to keep writing in spite of everything. The one and only
reason for that is that I believe I have a story of people who have
no voice, that only I can tell. I must now work hard and find a
way to tell that story so well that you, my reader, will care.
|
|
|
|